Polaris Ranger 500 vs Ranger 570 : full comparison

Choosing between the Polaris Ranger 500 and the Ranger 570 comes down to one question: do you want a lighter-duty, budget-friendly workhorse, or a more powerful, full-size utility vehicle built for heavier loads and longer days in the field? Below I compare the two across engine & performance, dimensions & handling, hauling/towing, comfort & features, reliability/maintenance, and value — then finish with buying recommendations so you can pick the Ranger that fits how you ride and work.

Quick Summary

Ranger 500 — a smaller, lighter, more affordable Ranger that focuses on everyday utility tasks, easy handling, and lower operating costs. Newer 500 models are based on the Ranger platform but tuned for lower horsepower and lighter-duty hauling (bed capacity ~300 lb).

Ranger 570 — the step up in power and payload. It uses a liquid-cooled 567cc single-cylinder engine (about 44 hp in most 570 variants), larger bed capacity (often advertised as 500 lb), and higher payload figures — designed for heavier farm, ranch, and commercial work.

Engine & Performance

Ranger 500: Polaris positioned the Ranger 500 to be a simpler, more utilitarian option. Recent model-year information shows the 500 uses a ProStar single-cylinder platform in the mid-500cc class but is detuned from the larger 570 — producing notably less horsepower (sources report around the high-20s to low-30s hp for some 500 variants). This gives adequate low-end torque for hauling and trail work but it won’t accelerate as briskly or haul as aggressively as the 570.

Ranger 570: The Ranger 570 is powered by a liquid-cooled 567cc single-cylinder engine with electronic fuel injection and about 44 horsepower in the common full-size configuration. That extra power translates into better towing, steadier highway or road speeds with loads, and more capability in steep or technical terrain. The 570’s drivetrain options (On-Demand True AWD, Turf Mode, and PVT automatic) give more versatility for mixed work and trail use.

Verdict: For basic property chores and lower-speed trail work the 500’s power is sufficient; for towing, heavier payloads, or when you want more reserve power, the 570 is the better choice.

Dimensions, Handling & Ride

Both Rangers share a similar platform feel but with differences in suspension travel, ground clearance, and curb weight depending on trims.

Handling: The 500’s lighter curb weight generally makes it feel nimbler on tight trails and easier to maneuver in confined spaces. The 570 is heavier, which helps stability under load but makes it slightly less razor-sharp in tight turns.

Ground clearance & suspension: The 570 models often have slightly more suspension travel and higher ground clearance in some trims (specs show around 10–11 inches), which helps on rougher terrain and when carrying loads.

Verdict: If you prioritize trail agility (tight ranch tracks, orchard rows), the 500 is appealing. If you want comfort on long runs and better capability over rough ground while loaded, the 570 is preferable.

Payload, Bed Capacity & Towing

This is where the differences become concrete for many buyers.

Ranger 500: Bed capacity is commonly listed near 300 lb for newer 500 trims; payload and towing ratings are scaled to lighter use. For small property work and short hauls this is often enough.

Ranger 570: Typical bed/box capacity for full-size 570 models is around 500 lb, and payload figures are higher (many specs list payloads in the 900–1,100 lb range depending on model). Hitch towing rating commonly remains 1,500 lb across many Ranger models, so towing capability can be similar but the 570’s higher payload and stronger engine make trailering and loaded operation easier.

Verdict: For carrying heavier materials, larger coolers, or extra gear the 570 wins. The 500 is fine for lighter farm chores and weekend trail loads.

Comfort, Ergonomics & Features

Both machines offer practical seating and controls, but trim choices influence comfort.

Seating & cab: The 570 range includes full-size and Crew variants with 2- and 3-/4-seat options in some trims. The 500 tends to be more basic and focused on two-up utility configurations. If you need to carry passengers regularly, check the 570 Crew variants.

Features: The 570 commonly offers more accessory and tech options — nicer dash layouts, more accessory compatibility (heated grips, integrated tool mounts, premium suspension packages). The 500 is trimmed for utility and value, though it still accepts many Polaris accessories like roofs, windshields, and storage solutions.

Verdict: For creature comforts and configurability the 570 lineup has broader choices. The 500 is intentionally straightforward.

Reliability & Maintenance

Both vehicles are built on Polaris’s long-running Ranger architecture and share many components, which helps keep maintenance familiar.

Routine service: Expect regular oil, filter, drive-belt, and brake checks for either model. The 570’s liquid-cooled engine and higher output may require slightly more attentive cooling-system checks under heavy commercial use.

Parts & service network: Polaris has a broad dealer network — parts availability is generally good for both platforms. Anecdotally, owners report that the 570’s higher cruising speeds and heavier use means it sometimes draws more frequent heavy-use service than the 500.

Verdict: No surprising gotchas — choose based on how hard you’ll run the vehicle. Light users will find the 500 lower cost to maintain over time; heavy users may accept more service for the 570’s capability.

Price & Value

MSRP and real-world prices depend on trim, options, and regional dealer incentives. In general:

Ranger 500 — positioned as the more budget-oriented Ranger (lower entry price; fewer standard bells and whistles).

Ranger 570 — higher base pricing but also higher capability and better resale value for heavy users. The 570 often represents stronger long-term value for buyers who need its hauling/towing/power.

Verdict: If your budget is tight and your use is light, the 500 is attractive. If you regularly tow, haul, or carry people, the 570’s extra capability usually justifies the price gap.

Which one should you buy?

Buy the Ranger 500 if: you mainly do light property work, value lower purchase and operating costs, need a nimble two-seater for trails and chores, and don’t regularly carry very heavy loads.
Buy the Ranger 570 if: you tow trailers or heavy implements, carry larger payloads or passengers often, need stronger on-demand AWD and more engine reserve, or want a more configurable platform for commercial or demanding ranch/farm work.

Conclusion

The Polaris Ranger 500 and Ranger 570 share family DNA but serve different needs. The 500 is the practical, budget-minded worker that’s easier to handle and cheaper to operate. The 570 is the higher-capacity, more powerful machine built to carry heavier loads, tow more confidently, and serve buyers who push their machines harder. Decide first on the work you’ll ask of the machine (payload and towing are the clearest drivers), then match features and trims to your budget.

FAQs